The following is a transcript of the John B. Wells program,
“Ark Midnight: The Intelligence Briefing / The Killing Fields”.
ARK MIDNIGHT: THE INTELLIGENCE BRIEFING/THE KILLING FIELDS
I found this segment to contain an amazing amount of information, so much so, that I wanted to share in a format that could easily be referred to, again & again.
*BEGINNING FROM THE 1:34:24 MARK:
JOHN: 1:34:24
Todd Callender, Esq. is an international Lawyer, licensed in Colorado, but practicing, primarily, outside of the United States. Most recently filed the first lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Defense, The Department of Health & Human Services, & The Food & Drug Administration, that's all the way back to 2021, in Robert vs. Austin, which sought to stop the vaccine mandates & the DOD & inter alia caused the DOD to abandon forced vaccinations while insuring access to exemption procedures for nearly 400,000 services members, & now, he's been so effective, that the mandates have been dropped, & the Marines are asking for people to come back.
Without further ado, he's got a big story to tell us tonight, Todd Callender, Esq."
TODD:
"Thanks for having me, John. I'm just so happy to be here. Listen, I want to go to your, "You People Are Morons" rally. When do we do that?"
JOHN: 1:35:16
(Laughs) I don't know, let's put it together. We'll have a bit of fun, & maybe even enlighten a few people.
TODD:
Yeah, I like that, I saw that piece, um, that you had last week, or something, & it's really quite absurd, now they're gonna blame us. I think that's just more gaslighting, it's just a bunch of the nonsense from the media that controls everything, we now see it, & I heard you speaking earlier about the Pfizer executive on his date, he's gonna wow his potential partner, there, with talk of, you know, manufactured viruses."
JOHN 1:35:52
(Laughs) Yeah, that's some pillow talk. I'm sure he saved the best part for later. Wow.
(They both laugh.)
TODD:
I was struggling with that. You know, the whole thing, it blows me away, & I did want to talk about, what does it mean, what does it translate to? The hubris of that guy is just astounding, & I have to tell ya, I dealt with Pfizer executives like that when I was in Cuba, doing clinical field trials for my family's needle free injector, & towards the end of that project, I was asked to introduce Pfizer executives to the highest levels of Cuban government. And, I'll never forget it, just exactly how disgusting these people were, sitting in the Hotel Nacional, they were giving the locals just a ration of crap, for no reason whatsoever, treating them badly, because they were domineering, & just full of hubris, & God hates hubris. So, to see that brought back a lot of memories, & it really disgusted me. And, it reminds me really where it is we are, with this talk of Public/Private Partnership. That is communism. That's what that is. I spent three years living in a communist country in Cuba, & before that I was living in Poland, that was coming out of communism. So, when I hear these catch phrases, you know, Build Back Better, & all of 'em. Public/Private Partnership in particular, is just like a knife to the heart, as people seem to have forgotten what that means, when government gets involved in business. When they get involved in commerce. Are you following me?
JOHN: 1:37:24
Oh, I am. Absolutely. Go on.
TODD:
Where does it stop? Where does it stop? It was bad enough, when, as a kid, they introduced seat belts & said, well, you have to wear those. And then, incrementally, It got more intrusive. You've got to wear a yellow jacket if you're gonna be a construction worker. And, you go down this slippery slope where every facet of human behavior is regulated, & when I took the BAR in 1995, there were 270,000 volumes of active law. I checked. So, you know, city, county, whatever, all the way up to federal law, & every agency in between. Can you imagine, the U.S. is regulating people to the tune of 270,000 volumes, that's books of law, & that was 30 years ago.
So, I think what happened was, they ran out of law. So now, we've got to take over business, itself, or is it business taking over the government, & that's what this guy is talking about, is business taking over government, that, towards the end of that whole conversation he talks about how all the government guys come to work for Pfizer later.
And, we saw that, even with the approval of these clinical drugs, they call them vaccines, which is a bunch of hogwash. It's just the level of hubris, how proud they are that they conducted regulatory capture. They have no doubt that they can manufacture, that they can direct the evolution of these bugs, & the FDA's gonna look the other way. In fact, that really already kinda happened.
JOHN: 1:38:57
Well, they claim it's not gain of function, but I mentioned earlier in the broadcast, when something evolves, it's gaining function, isn't it?
TODD:
Yes.
JOHN: 1:39:05
So, are we splitting hairs, here?
TODD:
Yes! That's exactly what it's doing. It's probably a lawyer, because it's just another way to describe the exact same thing. And, it's not like it's new. You know, one of the things that we had found in our case, we struggled to understand what it was, & how it was that the DOD was getting away without informed consent, when it came to the vaccine "mandate" in the DOD. And, the reality is, that this never was a vaccine, it's a gene therapy.
And, when we found the seminal case on this point, it's called Molecular Pathology vs Myraid Genetics. I know we've talked about it Effectively, the holding of the case, is that if you genetically modify a creature, a being, a genome, the synthetic product that is, is now owned by the patent holder. And, my point in telling you all of this, is that, this has been in process, that case is in 2013, & they've been genetically modifying everything. There's a division of Health & Human Services that is genetically, responsible for genetic modification of plants & animals, & now, seemingly, humans.
So, if the FDA is regulatorily captured by BigPharma, where does it end? Is there any end to the depravity?
JOHN: 1:40:26
You know, something you said a minute ago sparked this thought. I met a Bulgarian. Formerly a Bulgarian, came to the United States, who had lived under communism. And, he spoke to me about the wide spread prejudice of people who had gone into owning their own businesses, their own shops, & things like that. So, in the same way, & by the way, when the publisher, doesn't mean the publisher was on the level with this, says, no, no, that was all satire. We've made the correction, now. Oh, well, okay, fine.
But, could it actually get to a point where fascism & socialism are so infused into these kids in the upcoming generation, that they really will resent people who are in private enterprise, rather than some sort of government job, in the same way that this supposedly satirical piece villainizes the unvaccinated for not doing enough for the vaccinated?
TODD:
Yeah. I think that's very astute. That's very astute.
And, I saw that, to some extent, the reverse of it, as Poland was coming out of communism. People went into their mattresses, & they had been hiding money, coins, gold, silver, anything of value, they had been hiding all those years in the Soviet Union, & they all invested it in the stock market, the smart ones, & there was a really big air of jealousy between those that were hanging onto communism, & the ones who saw an 1,800% growth in that market in the first year. I mean, 1,800% return on your money is pretty damn good.
So, there was that feature, & I think we saw what you described, really, just over the last two years, when they locked everybody down. The winners & losers were already chosen. And, that's how this model, the Soviet model economy works. There are pre chosen oligarchs that have businesses. You can say Bezos, for example, or frankly, even Mr. Musk. You know, they're fully integrated businesses, they're chosen to win, they get oligarchic contracts, & they can compete at such low prices, that moms & pops are forced out of business. So they become part of the apparatus, & that's where the Public/Private Partnership goes. There shall be no unlicensed breeding, or no unlicensed competition, kinda to your point.
JOHN: 1:42:48
Wow. Well…hmm…The Public/Private Partnership…so, how pervasive is it already, in our Country? I suspect it's very pervasive throughout Europe.
TODD:
Sure. Well, we all saw it. So, when the lockdowns happened, you all had your choice of Target & Walmart. Who else was open? You could go to Lowe's, or Home Depot. If you wanted to invest, Vanguard, & BlackRock. It's really just a function of who the chosen winners were. We had a chance to see that. Even industries. Liquor stores, they would be open. You could go get a lap dance, but you couldn't go to church.
So, that's the government shaping policies you described, is there going to be a point when kids think it's a bad thing to be an entrepreneur? And, I think so! I think that…lemme go back a little bit…if you think about this…follow me on this journey…if you're in Cairo in 1994, at the Population Accords, you're sitting there with 195 other countries, & you're thinking about how you're gonna kill seven billion people, how would you go about doing that? Because, that's what they agreed. They agreed to depopulate the planet to the tune of seven billion people, more or less.
Would you control the money supply? Would you control the food supply? Would you control access to resources? Would you control industry? Would you control education? Fuel supply? And, the messaging, right, the Department of Education, I think it was 1958, came out of the UN Convention, you control, you know, what's going into your kid's brain.
And, I think all of that comes to where we are now. It's even down to controlled breeding. They put sterilization compounds in the shots.
So, who's gonna have access? Who's gonna be here, & who's gonna be in control?
JOHN: 1:44:45
What about the, um…I don't wanna get ahead of things, here, but, how 'bout these mandates going away for the military? And, now the Marine Corp., there's an article up on Jellyfish News right now, saying, we kinda need some troops, here, could some of you guys we kicked out come back, please? Girls, too? Could you come back? I mean, what an embarrassment.
TODD:
Yeah, where do they get off? Hard won, was that one. There is no esprit de corps. You know, when we filed that suit, we had a presumptive class of 200,000 or so plaintiffs in a class of people, similarly situated, & that class was people who had already had Covid, they didn't need the shot, because they already had immunity.
And, throughout the course of this suit, really what happened was, they thought to themselves, they all helped each other, & said, no, we're gonna file exemptions, we're gonna file complaints, & it was really by virtue of the service members, who just papered the crap outta DOD, that this thing stopped.
So, that word travels really fast in the military, & I think what you're hearing now, they can't recruit people, because it's traveling outside the military now. I saw that they're giving bonuses for service members who can drag somebody in. People don't want to wear the uniform, because they don't trust the leadership, & I think that actually translates into, you know, this attempt at NATO, to try to start a war with Vladimir, & I don't think it's gonna work.
JOHN: 1:46:09
Todd Callender, Esq.'s notes include this:
Secretary of Defense Austin knew that DOD de-med (?) data leak showed destruction of U.S. troops: HIV up 580%; heart attacks up 269%; pulmonary embolisms up 467%, January to November, 2021. And yet, he still mandated the vaccine in August of 2021.
So, I mean, is this a calculated destruction of the military, while simultaneously, we push all this hardware into Ukraine, because Russia bad, Ukraine good, run by that twisted little freak, Zelensky, I mean, allegedly. He's just who we see, no telling who's running it.
This doesn't look like just a coalescence of idiotic decisions. It looks like a plan to take the Country down to a helpless level. Is that over the edge?
TODD:
It's not just the Country, it's a global plan, yes.
The motto of those in charge, the Bank of International Settlements, is, um, Ordo Ab Chao, Order Out of Chaos, or Order From Chaos. They have to destroy the world economy, destroy every nation, in order to rebuild it the way that they want it, & then, yes, to answer your question.
We put evidence in front of the court, which means that the DOD got it, HHS, & FDA got it. They got the same papers we served the Department of Justice. And, the answer to your question is yes. We put in testimony from very knowledgeable people that took data from the military's own data base, their epidemiological data base, & it showed an 1,100 all cause, all morbidity rise 2021 over 2020.
The point of which is that we had a sick & dying military after these shots started, & we made sure that the DOD was aware of that.
Tell me this: if you're the Secretary of Defense, & you decide you're going to shoot all 1.4 million of your troops, your standing army, standing navy, military, with an experimental drug, where all of the test animals died, or were killed, how, exactly, would you have been put in that position in the first place?
JOHN: 1:48:38
That's a really good question. I don't know who would be the one to put a person in that position, & pull the trigger on a monstrous agenda like that.
TODD:
And, even now, even now, in fact, we just put our brief in to the 10th Circuit on this very issue. The DOJ is saying our case is mute, because the National Defense Authorization Act has now caused the military to rescind, the law says they must rescind the mandate. And yet, no such thing happens.
You know, you just made reference to it with the Marines. There's a Marine Corps Corporal who's now sitting in jail in Okinawa, & her crime was being acquitted from the first time that she was tried for not following an illegal order.
So, rescind means to make whole, to return the parties to where they were before it started. And there is no such thing happening. There's no back pay. There is no hiring back the people that got thrown out. There is no giving them the retirement out that was stolen.
So, how exactly are you going to attract people, whose job it is to sacrifice themselves for a nation, who doesn't appreciate you, who isn't going to stand with you, & frankly, who's trying to kill you.
I mean, it's not like they don't know this is happening.
JOHN: 1:49:55
I don't even know if we can say over the public airwaves, but why not. Who has the power to give this kind of order? Is it, to use that word again, unfortunately, a bunch of like minded higher ups, coalescing, & then handing down the dictates to the subordinates? Is that how this happens, or is there a single point of origin for this whole monstrous thing? Is it the United Nations? I mean…
TODD:
No. No, no. The…follow me on this…so, if you are the one who owns all the central banks on the planet, central banks are the ones who print the money, & you own all of them substantially, there are three notable exceptions to that, & you get to make money out of thin air, what couldn't you buy?
If you made yen, you made dollars, you made pounds sterling, & people accepted that as a medium of exchange, they'd trade goods & services for your piece of paper that you created out of thin air, what couldn't you buy?
Wouldn't that include governments? Wouldn't that include people? Militaries? Literally everything on the planet, stocks, bonds, water, jewels, everything. So that, this is what we're talking about, here. The Bank for the International Settlements, buying through their organs, the IMF, IBOR, ABOR, World Bank, etc., effectively owns all the central banks on the planet, save a few notable exceptions, namely, one of which is Russia's, & they used to own it. Russia took it back. Isn't it funny that they're not so happy with him.
Now, you know, the last guy to take his bank back was Gaddafi. Funny how that is, you know, the most hated guy, what was it that Hillary said, We came, we saw, he died?
Cuba. Cuba is another example. And, North Korea. So, all the bad guys on this planet are the ones that kept their money making to themselves.
JOHN: 1:51:51
I hear there's something going on between states, the United States. I wanna say Missouri & Arkansas, having conversations about legal tender. I wonder where this is all going, I really do. It's a mess.
TODD:
They have to. For the purposes of international law, you might have seen that Biden made the Declaration of North America, along with Mexico's President Obrador, & Trudeau from Canada. That is the dissolution of the United States of America.
When a Country, or some entity, seeks to be a sovereign, the the first thing you do is stake out a territory & then defend it. What they did is undo that territory. They said there is no longer borders. We're now one area. And, what's interesting, that ties into what you said, almost immediately thereafter, Governor DeSantis said, No, no, this is Florida, we have a State Guard, not a National Guard. Oh, & by the way, we're not following your stupid Federal rules on passports, Covid passports, & things of that nature.
The coining & printing of money is also one of those indicators. There's a laundry list. If you apply for a Nation to be recognized by the U.N., for example, how does one demonstrate that? And, the printing & coining of money is one of those things. And, you're absolutely right, Utah, Arkansas, Missouri, for sure, & there's a few other notable ones that, off the top of my head, I don't remember.
But, the states are doing exactly what it was that Governor DeSantis did in their own way. They're establishing their sovereignty, & don't forget, The United States, capital "U", there. The Federal government is comprised of the States. It's the 10th Amendment to our Constitution, the States reserve unto themselves their own sovereignty. So, there is no Federal government without the States, & what we're seeing now, is a lot of the States are standing up & saying, no, no, no, we are sovereign, we're not going along with this North American Declaration.
JOHN: 1:53:50
Whoofh. Where's BlackRock in all of this? Or is it?
TODD:
It's an acquisition vehicle for the Bank of International Settlements. For the BIS. They own more than 40% of all the publicly traded securities, in every exchange in the world.
JOHN: 1:54:07
(Chuckles incredulously.) Oookaaay. Can this be overcome? I know you're working to overcome it, but I mean, can we win, because this thing is just tore up from the floor up.
TODD:
Yeah, I think we can. And, you know what is actually working? I mentioned a few minutes ago esprit de corps in the military is really bad. And, I say bad, because they're unhappy with their leadership, right, I mean they all know that they've been screwed. They all know they were given a poison. And, even if they don't want to admit it, they talk quietly amongst themselves.
So, there is now this move, NATO has now announced that they have the will & the means to fight Russia. They're going to have this end of all worlds battle with Russia, (chuckling) except I don't think they have the means to pull it off. I mean, a couple hundred thousand Poles are now dead. In Ukraine, it's hundreds of thousands, it's not just a few, & it's not just Poles, either, it's multi nationals, NATO countries, effectively. And, the troops are not going for it. I have a lot of sources in the military from our cases. As I understand it, there is no will to fight. People are finally understanding, look, if you lie to me about the stupid shots, safe & effective, what else are you going to lie to me about? You stole my buddy's pension, you're not gonna give it back to him, after Congress tells you to do it?
By the way, your courts are kicking out all these cases, trying to stop the shots, get redress, get money for sick & injured people. There is not stomach for it, John.
The higher ups can demand anything they want, but, without THE CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED, they can't do a damn thing.
JOHN: 1:55:53
Okay. Alright. As long as a light at the end of the tunnel. I'm in. As a matter of fact, we're in whether we sense any light at the end of the tunnel or not, we're still in, so we might as well get some while we're here.
You make some really great points. Target & Walmart. They were the ones who were open. And, that was most enlightening. When we say this, it's almost cliché, now, but Presidents & politicians are selected, not elected. That's not true in all cases, but it seems that in the most major instances, they're set up a looong time in advance. Go back & try & find that thing that, um, Joe Biden recorded, or it was put on a recording, about, he's not going to say he's not corrupt, but come back when you're 40, & this kind of stuff. Yeah, there's definitely a, um, a selection factor.
This is The Ark. We'll be back. (COMMERCIAL BREAK)
JOHN: 2:06:24
As we visit here, with Todd Calender, Esq. He's changing the world, one problem at a time, he really is.
But, I would really like to, um, to get your comments about Pfizer being a vertically integrated, monolithic company.
First of all, please tell us what vertically integrated means, & then, the WHO being the policy master, & the DOD, effectively being the enforcer. Could you just kinda cover all of that with one swoop? I know you can.
TODD:
Yeah, sure. Well, starting with fully integrated means that the company, the one that's ultimately responsible for delivering the product to the marketplace, owns, either directly, or through subsidiaries, every part of the manufacturing process, from the dirt, literally, to the end product, whatever that is being delivered.
So, in the case of Pfizer, they will own, control, or otherwise be able to grow the components, whether that's chemicals, or biologics, through the manufacturing process, to the end product.
And, maybe even more so, in a case like Pfizer, in terms of being fully integrated, because they're so big, & they're so powerful, that would probably include growing up some politicians, you know, along the way, that they would put in place, 50 years later. Or, anything else that they might need to accomplish their goals.
You know, companies like Pfizer, they don't know what national boundaries are. They're truly multinational, in fact, they're global in every respect. And, they're so powerful, that it's not just organs of the FDA that they control. It's organs of other nations. Including policy.
So, when a fully integrated company like that, a global fully integrated company like that, who may be growing components in India, & packaging elsewhere, mixing it in China…we actually have a whistleblower, by the way, who was Quality Assurance Auditor for Pfizer, he told us how their ingredients for their BioNtech Comirnaty arrived from China, in a sealed plastic bag, marked completely in Chinese writing. They had no idea what the contents were. They we just told by Pfizer it's fine, you know, just stick it in the vile, we'll call it Comirnaty. That's what I mean by fully integrated, every step of the process, from the dirt to the finished product being sold on the shelves, or, in their case, being shot into the arm.
But, this goes back to the Public/Private Partnership as well. How does Pfizer do that? Well, these are experimental shots, they're what's called EUA, Emergency Use Only, because, like all other things in our government, the Constitution was effectively suspended, because there were exigent circumstances, as the law calls it.
So, The National Emergencies Act was declared in March of 2020, followed by The Public Health Emergency, which means that we all lost our Constitutional rights, so the military was able to drive through Covid countermeasures, otherwise known as the shots, & through this partnership, ok, so you've got Pfizer, who's making all this stuff, you've got the DOD, who's paying for it, & you've got the WHO, out there doing public policy, saying we've got to do this again, harmonizing that throughout the planet. The WHO made sure that what's happening in the United States is happening everywhere else on the planet, at the exact same time, & the military has delivered on that promise through their engagements with other countries.
Of course, Pfizer being as global as they are, paid off every politician they had to make it happen. That's a good example of a Public/Private Partnership gone wrong.
Where it ends in kind of a lack of distinction between Communism & Fascism.
JOHN: 2:10:30
Forgive me if I just remind everyone that the hospital up the road, one mile away from our place, was a part of the big Baylor Scott White outfit, & it was completely empty, with the exception of half a dozen cars in the parking lot, & 4 or 5 lights on in the building.
And then after, oh, I don't know, almost two years, it sprang back to life. And, I just wonder, I mean, this is absolutely monstrous. Do we think it's really all coordinated out of the U.N.? Nobody really know it, because nobody really knows what the U.N. does, unless it's Khrushchev banging his shoe on the table, saying, "We will bury you", or something like that, like what happened in the early 60's. We don't really know what they do, or the World Health Organization. That's an action arm of the United Nations. I wonder if the U.N. will turn out to be the biggest criminal organization that ever existed. I'm just asking.
TODD:
Well, sure. Let's look at the founding of the United Nations. The founding document was the Lucifer Trust. I kid you not. They later changed the name to Lucis Trust. But, that, is, in fact, so. It is the facade. When you're looking at these big players, here & there, & they have titles behind their name, & they sound really important, like Secretary General of the United Nations, it is just the apparatus, it is the governmental apparatus, that these owners of the world, the same ones I described The Bank for International Settlements, use as a function of control. All governments are used as a mechanism to control the population.
So, when you move toward a one world government, you must have a regulatory framework to supports that. People must look to, gee, what does the ultimate authority say?
So, the United Nations is a place holder. The means by which they fool the world into thinking there's this governing body, full of good people, doing good things for humanity, like the World Health Organization, & UNICF, we're feeding kids, when, in reality, it's just a control paradigm. That's all it is. The WHO is equally controlled.
So you think that there's these good willed people. But, if you look at the 2005 international health regulations, that the WHO put into existence, through Convention, you will find that there is an executive council that effectively manages the WHO, the executive body, which is almost completely comprised of Bill Gates executives. These are Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation executives. So, who's paying the bill, actually, is half the thing. Their charity, there in again, the Public/Private Partnership, their charity, I think comprises nearly half the total budget of the WHO these days.
So, it's just the same old thing. It's to fool us into thinking that they have some kind of authority, because they have to convince people that this is the way to be governed.
JOHN: 2:13:28
Now, what about this Organization for Economic Cooperation & Development being the U.N.'s tax & fiscal policy arm?
TODD:
Yeah, that actually happened. So, while America was occupied with double cheese burgers, & football, outside of the United States, where I happened to live, we've been kinda dying under the weight of the OECD's regulation, so the OECD is the Organization for Economic & Cooperative Development, & when I say it's the tax & fiscal policy arm of the United Nations, it's because they are the regulator, the super regulator.
If you can imagine this: They now want to have something called Tax Inspectors Without Borders. And, they put into place, this giant information sharing network, where every government on this planet, who is a member, there's 183 of them, to the OECD, has an obligation, by treaty, to collect the data on all financial instruments that belong to other people.
So, you might have a bank account in Timbuktu. Well, that bank has an obligation to tell their government what you have, who's related to it, where it is, what the daily balances are, what the monthly balances are & have been, historically & otherwise. Anything, & everything relating to an asset, or something of value gets reported to this information matrix.
It's under something called The Common Reporting Standards. The OECD Tax & Fiscal policy is effectuated through common reporting standards. And, that's the mechanism by which everybody is reported.
So, every last breathing human body on this planet, anything you own on this planet, is now in the possession, that information is in the possession of the OECD.
So, in 2016, they went to all the member nations & said we are now going to take over the tax & fiscal policy of your country, & you could have politicians if you want to, but, we're in charge, because that's effectively what all the heads of the OECD agreed to do.
Again, this One World Government strata that they were creating.
And, sure enough, that's what happened. So the OECD put in place something called Competent Authorities, so that, in the case of an emergency, a health emergency, the Minister of Health would become a Competent Authority. Or, in the case of something military, then the Minister of Defense would become the Competent Authority. But, as chosen by the OECD. Not as chosen by the people.
So, it doesn't make any difference if you have a Prime Minister, or a President, it has no bearing whatsoever, the OECD is in charge. And, all of that happened while the United States was asleep, & now, this is the last domino to fall.
JOHN: 2:16:06
Tell us what happened 11 days before Trump took office.
TODD:
Yeah…that was another…boy…yeah…so, I think it was another, just a play on the poor guy, I hope that's the case.
They changed the gain of function rules, effectively legalize it. I think it was the Science Czar, Holdren, if memory serves.
And, the reality is that they put back to work the prohibitions that had previously existed.
And, where was this gain of function research done? Again, it's globally, it was done in Ukraine. It was done in Taiwan. Clearly done in Wuhan, China. And, done inside the United States of America. To make these pathogens more deadly. That's the goal of the enterprise.
JOHN: 2:16:57
Okay, let's bounce over to the money. The central bank digital currency.
TODD:
Yeah, it's all related.
So,…
JOHN: 2:17:08
Do you think that's gonna happen? Sorry to interrupt you, you said so…
TODD:
No, it's fine. No, you asked a good question. They already did.
So, they rolled out the Fed coin a some weeks ago, nobody heard about it. My understanding is it's not going well, & they ruled out central bank digital currency outside of the United States. Where I live, they ruled it out about three years ago, nobody wants to use it.
In the Southern Caribbean, it's about the same, three years ago. Nobody wants to use it. For a lot of different reasons, & the funny part about it, the reason why it's not gonna work, is because, thank God, FTX blew up.
The Central Bank Digital Currencies are block chain, they're tokens, effectively. They're like BitCoin, but issued by the Central Banks.
China has done this. So, if you want to pay for something, you'd better get your phone out, because that's how you're gonna pay for it.
Except for one thing, these are programmable currencies. They were always designed to be programmable, so if you're in China, you can't travel five kilometers away from your home without permission, because, guess what, if you do, your money won't work.
If you eat too much meat for this month, & they know, because your currency is programmable, & reporting your activities. They'll cut you off. You will not be able to buy meat. It's literally the mark of the beast system, & that was planned in 1988. Right on the cover of The Economist magazine, had a picture of an eagle, with a BitCoin around its neck, standing on a pile of burning cash, & it said, By 2018, we're going to have central bank digital currency. In fact, it was the IMF digital currency. And, here we are 2023, & it still hasn't happened. And, the FTX blowup was actually a wonderful thing, because, that was an agreement, with Bill Clinton & his crew came to FTX, & they were gonna turn it into the carbon trading platform for people's personal carbon emissions. Debits & credits, depending on how much carbon you will expel or use, as it relates to your spending on your digital currency.
So, all of that was planned. And, with FTX blowing up, it doesn't look like anybody has any faith in digital currencies as it is. I shouldn't say nobody does, I mean, a lot of people lost faith in this, because they found out you can steal them just as easy as any other money.
JOHN: 2:19:36
And, how about, um, the old Obama/Biden Science Czar, John Holden's 1977 book that said bio warfare lab leak, potential manmade solution. These people are crazy.
TODD:
And, it goes back to circa 1976. At least when you could actually see it visibly. Kissinger actually published a paper, read into the U.N. General Assembly, & it talked about depopulation, the planet is overpopulated, we're gonna have to do something, as a species, to reduce it.
And, out of that came the 1994 Cairo Population Accords. And, there's actually a Population Division in the United Nations. And, in those Cairo Accords, 196 countries & territories agreed to depopulate the planet, as I put it, kill seven billion people. And, that's more or less what's happened.
How many different ways would they have to do this? Seven billion people is a lot! Wouldn't you have to do that a lot of different ways, including controlling the medicine? How many poisons do we actually think we are in-taking?
JOHN: 2:20:51
Well, you know, I think we're taking in quite a number of poisons. I just saw some today, this is a little off track, but not much, that Tylenol, acetaminophen, will cause autism, if given to children from infants, up to about two years old, maybe even three. So…
TODD:
Not surprised.
JOHN: 2:21:11
Neither am I.
TODD:
When have they not done that? In 1969, autism was 1 in 100,000 kids. Now it's 1 in 38 boys. What's changed? And, I can tell you, a lot of it changed in 1986, when Bush passed the first immunity laws for vaccine manufacturers.
If you read them, the prelude to the (Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act) PREP Act's legislation, & legislation history, you will find that it states, that 20% of the people who got the vaccine, in that point in time, had serious adverse affects. And, there was no way the vaccine manufacturers could produce them, unless they got protection immunity. And, then we wonder by everybody's sick.
JOHN: 2:22:02
This may seem a little lame, Todd, but, I'm just asking, is there any recourse against these monsters at all? They seem to have immunized themselves from taking any kind of responsibility at all for this, & they're just out. It's almost as if they're given license for this, raise hell all over the world, but, they're good, they're covered legally.
TODD:
Yeah, in many respects, that's true. Except, you know, some things are changing. Things are not as they appear.
You know, I keep saying, the owners of this world seem to be missing, the one's that own the Bank for International Settlements, because some of the things the non sequiturs we see are impossible if they had been in place.
You look at Kazakhstan, & Vladimir Putin took over Astana. That was the new home for the Bank of International Settlements.
The fact that NATO hasn't been able to go into Ukraine & for instance, there are war crimes tribunals taking place by Russia in Donbas.
All of those things show me that the plan is actually not working. And, I think it's not working for two reasons: Number one, all these gangsters, they want it for themselves, & they're fighting amongst themselves. So, as long as there's competition, we're safe.
Part two of that, I really do firmly believe that four or five years of Trump being in office so slowed this whole plan, that's been in existence for at least a hundred years, it was so intricate, that that hiatus has caused all of the gears to malfunction. And, all the timing is off, & people can see what's happening. And, it's going to boil down to this: people are recognizing what's happening, & they're not gonna go with the program again.
Without the consent of the governed, you can't do it. If there's no law enforcement, there's no law. People in uniform, whether that's military or police, say, no, I'm not going to enforce something that's not constitutional, no, I'm not going to agree to the U.S. is no longer a sovereign. They don't have any power. The people filling those roles depend upon your consent, your abdication.
I don't see it. I see people finding their spirit. Standing, maybe, for the first time, & thinking for themselves. And, that's the way we get out of this.
JOHN: 2:24:19
I think you're entirely correct. Because, at some point, it's gonna crack, it absolutely has to. Of course, we know that it'll morph into something else, if that's possible. Maybe we're catching up to them, they're masters at deceit, there's no doubt about it, absolute masters of it, & they're masters of backside covering, & deflecting responsibility, putting blame on other people, & stuff like that. But, what if they just run outta string? And, enough people get enough information that it just doesn't work anymore? I think that's pretty much the only way out of this, don't you think? I mean, nobody's gonna come save us, unless it's Jesus, Himself, & that'd be alright with me if He showed up in about 10 minutes. I'll be there with you all.
TODD:
How 'bout if we save ourselves? When the news media tells us it's safe & effective, & you see your cousin fall over dead for no reason, that might be a wake up moment.
When five black police officers kill a black man, a suspect, & they're being called racists, none of this is making sense anymore, & I think that's a good thing. Like I said, with our own service members, they don't want to go to war, they're not buying it anymore. They understand, now, this was all for profit, they were sacrificed. All of us were sacrificed.
By who? Who were the responsible parties? Everybody that was sitting in a position of power, the last 40, 50 years, either were part of this, or they knew & should have stopped it, & didn't. They abdicated.
So, yes. I think you're absolutely right. We just stop going with the program.
JOHN: 2:25:57
I think we all need to, collectively, & individually, stop making excuses. We didn't know…I didn't think…I was busy… Doing what? Doing what?
It's happening. I agree with you. I feel encouraged every time I go out & talk with people in public. Every once in awhile there's a clinker. But, I'll just chat up strangers, ask 'em what they think about things, & so many of them are wise to this.
TODD:
Yeah, well, that's it. You're getting that sense.
Like I said, if it weren't for the 4 or 5 year hiatus by itself, the man did a lot of good things, but, the best thing he did was stop the progression.
I don't know why, John, that they have 2030, they they've gotta, they being the BIS, the ones that are planning our demise, our global demise, I think that if they don't achieve their goal by 2030, all bets are off, it's over for them. So, all we have to do is frustrate their mission.
JOHN: 2:26:56
So, I've been asking this question over & over & over again, & I think you provided the answer, as to who directed the hiding of the therapeutics, hydroxychloroquine & ivermectin? Who gave the order? Ah! The clue is in the question. Over to you.
TODD:
Yeah, so I have come to understand, like I said, when you sue the Federal government, you get a lot of whistleblowers, that there were apparently six people inside the Pentagon. These were non military personnel that were inside the Pentagon, that were part of the plan to roll out. There's the DOD, that actually invented the mRNA, or are under contract, DARPA & ARPA, & these were influential people inside the DOD, & so it's impossible to have an Emergency Use Authorization for any drug, if there are already other drugs approved that can be used for. They had to eliminate any possibility that a different therapeutic would be used.
JOHN: 2:28:02
So, Emergency Use Authorization is null & void? Yeah?
TODD:
Well, yeah, absolutely. It's null & void if there are other therapeutics that could have been used. No investigative new drug can take the place of an already approved therapeutic.
JOHN: 2:28:19
Well, our segment has run its course, I'm afraid. I sure wanna talk to you for another hour, but I can't. Look, let's plan to talk again in the not too distant future. I'm pretty sure you've got your crosshairs on something, & we will be waiting to hear what that might be. Thank you for your good work. Fantastic.
TODD:
Yeah, thank you. John, it's always a pleasure.
JOHN:2:28:40
Mutual, sir. God bless. Stay safe out there. Safe as possible, strong as always.
Alright, when we return, you will be with me, John B. Wells, & The Man of War, Matt Braken.
This is the Ark.
/END.